AJT etched steins

This topic contains 12 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  Qas 5 years, 6 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #2066 Reply

    Joe
    Participant

    Is there a rough idea when etched steins were produced by AJT? Below is a stein I have that I was hoping to id the age. I believe (based on the website Stein Marks) it was possibly produced between 1907 and 1920. Below is a picture of the stein 463.

    Front

    Bottom

  • #2067 Reply

    Justin

    Your dates seem to be correct as this is a late “golden age” piece. It is very difficult to exactly pinpoint the year without some kind of original documentation like a production catalog.

  • #2068 Reply

    Ron

    Wilhelm Anton Kamp designed the first 816 steins made by AJT between 1897-1914. That would put the design at around 1907. It could have been produced anytime after that up to 1920, the last date for that AJT mark.

    Ron

  • #2069 Reply

    Joe
    Participant

    Justin or Ron,
    A few more questions for you.

    I first looked in the old stein catalogs on here but there seems to not be a AJT one, is there a reason for this? I would assume that none have made it over the years.

    I know that most stein numbers don’t go in any kind of order or relate to a given timeframe of production, is it different with AJT?

    It seems that most of the etched steins came towards the end of the golden era, besides those by V&B. Is it safe to assume that most by M&R, AJT, and others came after 1900 but before 1920? I have a few JWR and Gerz etched steins I have always wondered about as well.

    Like always, thank you for all the help you provided on this website.

  • #2070 Reply

    Ron

    My article on Thewalt in The Reading Room shows two of the older catalogs, but only a few steins are shown. I am sure if there were others, Albert would have shared them with us. There have been some etched steins made in the modern era, Mettlach being the most notable one.

    Ron

  • #2071 Reply

    Joe
    Participant

    Ron,
    I’m reading it now. When did you write this?

    • #2073 Reply

      Ron

      I wrote it in connection with the March 2009 Featured Stein, AT mold 390. I also have your stein, but mine has the more common gnome, clock and owl insert lid.

  • #2072 Reply

    Joe
    Participant

    The lid on the one pictured above is of the deer.

  • #2080 Reply

    Joe
    Participant

    Is there a significant reason why the two lids are different on the same stein? I had seen in your article that you own the same one. I didn’t realize that they made so few etched steins. I guess I’m lucky I got the one I did for next to nothing. Your article was a very good read.

    • #2081 Reply

      Ron

      The lid inserts are generic and are not specific to the design on the body of the stein. AJT and other stein makers would also vary the color schemes on the body of the stein.

  • #2082 Reply

    Joe
    Participant

    I had seen there was a blue one of my stein, which I like more and hope to find.

  • #2414 Reply

    Orlando

    Hello;Just wanted to pop by, I finllay re read comments on the blog. I linked your fabulous site from my post on the Franchophile Car.I can’t wait to read this article on Gertrude Stein.La Maison FouL.

  • #2446 Reply

    Qas

    LUIZAO disse:Em nenhum metmnoo o senador Roberto Requic3a3o impediu que o Senado Federal autorizasse o governo do Paranc3a1 a contratar emprc3a9stimos no exterior, na sessc3a3o da terc3a7a-feira, 18. Os fatos sc3a3o estes:1. Depois da aprovac3a7c3a3o de autorizac3a7c3a3o para que os estados do Cearc3a1, Bahia, Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina contratassem emprc3a9stimos externos, colocou-se em votac3a7c3a3o a autorizac3a7c3a3o para que o Paranc3a1 fizesse o mesmo. No entanto, ao contrc3a1rio dos pedidos de outros estados, o pedido do Paranc3a1 nc3a3o especificava onde seriam aplicados os recursos,. O relatc3b3rio apresentado senador Delcc3addio Amaral (PT-MT) falava apenas em investimentos no e2809cdesenvolvimento setoriale2809d, sem dizer o que isso poderia significar.2. Assim que lido o relatc3b3rio, o senador Requic3a3o perguntou ao senador Delcc3addio onde o dinheiro seria investido. A resposta do relator: e2809cBoa pergunta senador Requic3a3o, me deixa ver o que estc3a1 escrito aquie2809d. Mas o relator nc3a3o encontrou no documento que manipulava nada que pudesse esclarecer a ele prc3b3prio, ao senador Requic3a3o e ao plenc3a1rio.3. Diante disso, o senador Josc3a9 Sarney, que presidia a sessc3a3o, determinou que o pedido do Paranc3a1 fosse retirado de pauta, atc3a9 que se esclarecesse o destino dos 350 milhc3b5es de dc3b3lares reivindicados. E assim foi feito4. Sobre declarac3a7c3b5es de fonte do governo do estado , divulgadas por meios oficiosos via internet, dando conta de emprc3a9stimos semelhantes pedidos pelo entc3a3o governador Roberto Requic3a3o, esclarec3a7a-se:- quando pediu autorizac3a7c3a3o para contrair emprc3a9stimos externos, o entc3a3o governador apresentou um completo plano de aplicac3a7c3a3o dos recursos, elaborado por uma equipe multissecretarias e multidisciplinar do prc3b3prio governo estadual. O plano previa a aplicac3a7c3a3o de recursos na agricultura familiar, na inovac3a7c3a3o das tc3a9cnicas de produc3a7c3a3o desse setor, em ac3a7c3b5es de promoc3a7c3a3o social nos municc3adpios de menor IDH do estado, no combate c3a0 pobreza e c3a0 exclusc3a3o social. Os objetivos do projeto eram claramente fixados e dava-se conta onde seria investido cada centavo do emprc3a9stimo.- ao contrc3a1rio do pedido do atual governador, Requic3a3o nc3a3o destinava qualquer valor c3a0 consultorias ou c3a0 amplc3adssima e quase nunca esclarecida rubrica e2809creforma administrativae2809d ou c3a0 ainda mais nebulosa e2809celaborac3a7c3a3o de projetose2809d.- o secretc3a1rio de Planejamento de Beto Richa c3a9 o mesmo Cc3a1ssio Taniguchi que foi secretc3a1rio de Planejamento de Jaime Lerner, quando o endividamento do Paranc3a1 (interna e externamente) pulou de 1,4 bilhc3a3o de reais (1994, c3baltimo ano do primeiro Governo Requic3a3o), para 21 bilhc3b5es de reais (2002, c3baltimo ano do Governo Lerner). Logo, as antecedentes sc3a3o preocupantes.c389 o que se tinha a esclarecer. Reafirme-se: o senador Roberto Requic3a3o nc3a3o c3a9 contra emprc3a9stimos externos para o Paranc3a1. c389 contra, isso sim, o desperdc3adcio de recursos nc3a3o se sabe onde, sob que justificativas. De todo modo, se o governador Beto Richa nc3a3o gastasse 500 milhc3b5es de reais em propaganda (previsc3a3o para este ano); nc3a3o elevasse a participac3a7c3a3o do capital privado nos lucros da Copel em mais de 150 milhc3b5es de reais, sem qualquer justificativa para a generosidade com o dinheiro dos paranaenses; se nc3a3o elevasse de 25 para 50 por cento a participac3a7c3a3o do sc3b3cio privado da Sanepar nos lucros da empresa; se nc3a3o torrasse 5,6 milhc3b5es de reais em aluguel de avic3a3o, como pretende torrar, nc3a3o haveria necessidade de se emprestar os pretendidos 700 milhc3b5es de reais.c389c389c389c389c389c389c389c389c389c389c389c389c389c2b4, VADERRETO TUCANADAS DO DEMO!!! E MINHA CONTA DE LUZ COMO c389 Q FICA? GOVERNADORZINHO DE M MARIONETE DE PAULISTAS E MINEIROS.

Reply To: AJT etched steins
Your information:




Cancel